<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Usage of Images in Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:46:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>Ken - Yes that is a common belief for sure.

It also could be purely a legal thing, when you &quot;opt in&quot; to places like flicker.com (and now Google) you are giving permission for them to display your images in search. Google might be sensing people suing them in the future? Any legal experts in the house?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken &#8211; Yes that is a common belief for sure.</p>
<p>It also could be purely a legal thing, when you &#8220;opt in&#8221; to places like flicker.com (and now Google) you are giving permission for them to display your images in search. Google might be sensing people suing them in the future? Any legal experts in the house?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/better-usage-of-images-in-google/#comment-3303</guid>
		<description>Tag you&#039;re it.
I never thought that Google put much weight into what type of images you post online on your sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tag you&#8217;re it.<br />
I never thought that Google put much weight into what type of images you post online on your sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
