<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good SEO is no SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:46:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-13215</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-13215</guid>
		<description>If you build it, they will come.  If you SEO it, they will come, and be bored to tears.  ;-)

That&#039;s not exactly fair though as the &quot;SEO&#039;d&quot; sites that bore people to tears are not much better than MFA (Made For Adsense) sites, peoples&#039; goals being misplaced.  

At the same time, the &quot;SEO&#039;d&quot; sites seem to be done by people doing maybe the right things for the wrong reasons and ending up leaving the visitor to their site totally out of the equation. 

Even though one reads in blog after blog and webmasters forum after webmasters forum that one should build a site for humans, most people seem more interested in short term results and end up not realizing the no SEO can actually be good SEO.

Also, sometimes that hardest thing one can do to try to improve a given situation is, nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you build it, they will come.  If you SEO it, they will come, and be bored to tears.  ;-)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not exactly fair though as the &#8220;SEO&#8217;d&#8221; sites that bore people to tears are not much better than MFA (Made For Adsense) sites, peoples&#8217; goals being misplaced.  </p>
<p>At the same time, the &#8220;SEO&#8217;d&#8221; sites seem to be done by people doing maybe the right things for the wrong reasons and ending up leaving the visitor to their site totally out of the equation. </p>
<p>Even though one reads in blog after blog and webmasters forum after webmasters forum that one should build a site for humans, most people seem more interested in short term results and end up not realizing the no SEO can actually be good SEO.</p>
<p>Also, sometimes that hardest thing one can do to try to improve a given situation is, nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>I guess good SEO would be just following the guidelines laid down by the search engines and avoid indulging in black hat SEO techniques. Also important is to have patience to yield SEO results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess good SEO would be just following the guidelines laid down by the search engines and avoid indulging in black hat SEO techniques. Also important is to have patience to yield SEO results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pittfall</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>pittfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>I think that you are so close it&#039;s scarry... Good SEO is building for the user, the engines will find it and, more importantly, you will stay at the top! (because you deserve it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you are so close it&#8217;s scarry&#8230; Good SEO is building for the user, the engines will find it and, more importantly, you will stay at the top! (because you deserve it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOBAS</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>LOBAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>ive noticed this as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ive noticed this as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed Sam and offering a little something fun for your website guests goes a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed Sam and offering a little something fun for your website guests goes a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>After a few years of chasing links and listening to the &quot;experts&quot; it has become clear to me the key is to write. 

Taking the time to write a quality essay verus a 3-500 word piece of crap is the key to longterm success.

What came first content or the link?  No doubt in my mind that many links in the future will be devalued, but how can you devalue quality content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a few years of chasing links and listening to the &#8220;experts&#8221; it has become clear to me the key is to write. </p>
<p>Taking the time to write a quality essay verus a 3-500 word piece of crap is the key to longterm success.</p>
<p>What came first content or the link?  No doubt in my mind that many links in the future will be devalued, but how can you devalue quality content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>Well, smart SEO is invisible, as much as smart usability or marketing is. Everything just works when everything is done properly.

That&#039;s the point, Ahmed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.improvetheweb.com/providing-value-to-build-a-business/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Providing value&lt;/a&gt; is the key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, smart SEO is invisible, as much as smart usability or marketing is. Everything just works when everything is done properly.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the point, Ahmed. <a href="http://www.improvetheweb.com/providing-value-to-build-a-business/" rel="nofollow">Providing value</a> is the key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/good-seo-is-no-seo/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...

I think the real problem here is &#039;thinking too much&#039; about SEO.

Create something remarkable and authentic, and it will get links.

Create something that&#039;s in demand, and you&#039;ll be doing SEO.

Do both, and you&#039;re in business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>I think the real problem here is &#8216;thinking too much&#8217; about SEO.</p>
<p>Create something remarkable and authentic, and it will get links.</p>
<p>Create something that&#8217;s in demand, and you&#8217;ll be doing SEO.</p>
<p>Do both, and you&#8217;re in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
