<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sitelinks Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:46:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Spider-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-69882</link>
		<dc:creator>Spider-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-69882</guid>
		<description>Aaron - I agree, it must have something more to do with it than age. Our site is around 6 years old, yet hasn&#039;t generated any sitelinks. From my findings, sites - in our market - that do have sitelinks are those which have a steady, well maintained site with good structure. Not a heirarchical structure like most sites, more of a heirarchical loop, where all the pages under each category all link to the main categories - all the category pages all tend to have a relatively decent PR (3-4 +). If only someone could gain some real inside knowledge to how it&#039;s worked out, then it&#039;d make both Google alot more user-friendly and it&#039;d also help me with traffic.

On the contrary, I have seen sites with sitelinks that appear to have no real wealth on the internet - that truly just baffles me, but I guess someone&#039;s ought to know how to get sitelinks.

May the linkforce be with you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron &#8211; I agree, it must have something more to do with it than age. Our site is around 6 years old, yet hasn&#8217;t generated any sitelinks. From my findings, sites &#8211; in our market &#8211; that do have sitelinks are those which have a steady, well maintained site with good structure. Not a heirarchical structure like most sites, more of a heirarchical loop, where all the pages under each category all link to the main categories &#8211; all the category pages all tend to have a relatively decent PR (3-4 +). If only someone could gain some real inside knowledge to how it&#8217;s worked out, then it&#8217;d make both Google alot more user-friendly and it&#8217;d also help me with traffic.</p>
<p>On the contrary, I have seen sites with sitelinks that appear to have no real wealth on the internet &#8211; that truly just baffles me, but I guess someone&#8217;s ought to know how to get sitelinks.</p>
<p>May the linkforce be with you ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-69861</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-69861</guid>
		<description>That is a good question, I got a site that is several years old but not in sitelinks. There must be other factors than age that Google will not tell you about because they will expose what they use to determine authority. 

Sitelinks must remain a mystery, at least part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good question, I got a site that is several years old but not in sitelinks. There must be other factors than age that Google will not tell you about because they will expose what they use to determine authority. </p>
<p>Sitelinks must remain a mystery, at least part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjeev</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-69852</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-69852</guid>
		<description>today only i came to know about the sitelinks after searching the help center and others sources. I also read that for inclusion in sitelinks section the site should be older for few years; Here my question is that how many years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>today only i came to know about the sitelinks after searching the help center and others sources. I also read that for inclusion in sitelinks section the site should be older for few years; Here my question is that how many years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Doda</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-28716</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Doda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-28716</guid>
		<description>Google Sitelinks is very helpful for generating traffic to web site and also it lays out the base for making a web site &quot;authority&quot; web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Sitelinks is very helpful for generating traffic to web site and also it lays out the base for making a web site &#8220;authority&#8221; web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>I am not so sure of the &quot;monthly searches&quot; idea, it appears to be more of a quality/brand thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not so sure of the &#8220;monthly searches&#8221; idea, it appears to be more of a quality/brand thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Mezei</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Mezei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>It depends on the niche too Aaron. Not every searched word has those links for the #1 website.

It has to have a good number of monthly searches, for starters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the niche too Aaron. Not every searched word has those links for the #1 website.</p>
<p>It has to have a good number of monthly searches, for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>My product site is #2 and has flash in the header, I am going to make it more professional in code and content and see if I can pick up a sitelink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My product site is #2 and has flash in the header, I am going to make it more professional in code and content and see if I can pick up a sitelink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Mezei</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Mezei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 07:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/google-sitelinks-explained/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>I knew that a long time ago .. They are just saying what the community already knows.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We show them when we think they’ll be most useful to searchers&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah right. If it&#039;s #1, it will always have sitelinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that a long time ago .. They are just saying what the community already knows.</p>
<blockquote><p>We show them when we think they’ll be most useful to searchers</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah right. If it&#8217;s #1, it will always have sitelinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
