<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why to not noindex your feed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:46:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Van Hecke</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-69984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Van Hecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-69984</guid>
		<description>The problem has been solved: 
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/taking-feeds-out-of-our-web-search.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem has been solved:<br />
<a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/taking-feeds-out-of-our-web-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/taking-feeds-out-of-our-web-search.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-29912</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-29912</guid>
		<description>Cough... not nofollow, I meant &quot;index, follow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cough&#8230; not nofollow, I meant &#8220;index, follow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-29911</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-29911</guid>
		<description>It seems Google and Yahoo! now both support noindex for RSS feeds, no confirmation yet about nofollow though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Google and Yahoo! now both support noindex for RSS feeds, no confirmation yet about nofollow though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>Yea man, basically that&#039;s what I did. Looked at Matt&#039;s blog and copied atleast how he setup his blog and feed. I&#039;m also using Feedburner for the stats and email list but have all the features that he runs.

I DARE YOU to turn on that ugly calendar that was all the rage 2 years ago. haha

I also find that my feed gets indexed a few days before the original articles too. Nice little hack there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea man, basically that&#8217;s what I did. Looked at Matt&#8217;s blog and copied atleast how he setup his blog and feed. I&#8217;m also using Feedburner for the stats and email list but have all the features that he runs.</p>
<p>I DARE YOU to turn on that ugly calendar that was all the rage 2 years ago. haha</p>
<p>I also find that my feed gets indexed a few days before the original articles too. Nice little hack there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>Ken - This used to be the case not long ago but I am seeing Google getting it correct on my other blogs. Want me to put the Wordpress calendar back and see what happens? That used to be a duplicate content nightmare.

Note: I also went supplemental and I didn&#039;t even have categories showing until recently. I pretty much removed all duplicate paths and still fell into it.

If multiple paths to content all come from the same URL wouldn&#039;t Google by now have a way to figure it out? Look at Matt Cutts blog and others, they are default wordpress templates with calendar and categories linked sitewide in the sidebar (duplicates). If Google was getting it wrong that means 99% of wordpress blogs should be in supplementals because very few know how to remove duplicate paths right?

Again, SEO is not an exact science and I can only tell what I observe, my gut tells me Google is much smarter than me so getting Wordpress blogs right would be in their best interest.

More: Notice how Google can handle those who duplicate content with aggregators? Even if you have a new blog with little PR you eventually come out as the owner of your content right?

Don&#039;t forget to set your preferred domain: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/09/setting-preferred-domain.html

And blah blah and blah. =P

Update: Andy makes a good point &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seobuzzbox.com/understanding-pagerank-distribution/#comment-5719&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken &#8211; This used to be the case not long ago but I am seeing Google getting it correct on my other blogs. Want me to put the Wordpress calendar back and see what happens? That used to be a duplicate content nightmare.</p>
<p>Note: I also went supplemental and I didn&#8217;t even have categories showing until recently. I pretty much removed all duplicate paths and still fell into it.</p>
<p>If multiple paths to content all come from the same URL wouldn&#8217;t Google by now have a way to figure it out? Look at Matt Cutts blog and others, they are default wordpress templates with calendar and categories linked sitewide in the sidebar (duplicates). If Google was getting it wrong that means 99% of wordpress blogs should be in supplementals because very few know how to remove duplicate paths right?</p>
<p>Again, SEO is not an exact science and I can only tell what I observe, my gut tells me Google is much smarter than me so getting Wordpress blogs right would be in their best interest.</p>
<p>More: Notice how Google can handle those who duplicate content with aggregators? Even if you have a new blog with little PR you eventually come out as the owner of your content right?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to set your preferred domain: <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/09/setting-preferred-domain.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/09/setting-preferred-domain.html</a></p>
<p>And blah blah and blah. =P</p>
<p>Update: Andy makes a good point <a href="http://www.seobuzzbox.com/understanding-pagerank-distribution/#comment-5719" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobuzzbox.com/why-to-not-noindex-your-feed/#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>Aaron, doesn&#039;t this bring up the issue of duplicate content with Google? Showing 2 url&#039;s with the same content on each?

Seems when I dont add the rss feed in my robots.txt I&#039;m ok for a while but then go supplemental in MANY pages. As soon as I add the entry:

User-agent: Googlebot
Disallow: /*/feed/$

Then I come out of supplemental within a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, doesn&#8217;t this bring up the issue of duplicate content with Google? Showing 2 url&#8217;s with the same content on each?</p>
<p>Seems when I dont add the rss feed in my robots.txt I&#8217;m ok for a while but then go supplemental in MANY pages. As soon as I add the entry:</p>
<p>User-agent: Googlebot<br />
Disallow: /*/feed/$</p>
<p>Then I come out of supplemental within a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
